Decathlon 2000 › Search results: individual events

Search results: individual events


1 2 3 4 
61-69 / 69
Relevancy:8%
Fair Decathlon Model. Part 3: Forty Seasons, Cleaner Data, and Wider Calibration
How a larger and stricter sample changed the formulas without changing the conclusions
Relevancy:8%
Fair Decathlon Model. Part 4: Does FDM Balance the Ten Events?
A leave-one-event-out test of 17,277 complete decathlon performances
Relevancy:8%
Fair Decathlon Model. Part 5: How Far Down Does FDM Continue to Balance the Ten Events?
A leave-one-event-out test from 7,000 to 4,000 points
Relevancy:8%
Fair Decathlon Model. Part 7: Can Decathlon Calibrate Itself?
This article asks whether the decathlon’s own performance data can provide enough information to calibrate a fair scoring system without relying primarily on elite athletes. Using 27, 741 complete decathlons—and a separate dataset excluding all …
Relevancy:8%
Fair Decathlon Model. Part 8: The B Parameter – Where Should Zero Points Begin?
Part 8 takes the Fair Decathlon Model into its deepest territory yet, examining B — the parameter that determines where scoring reaches zero. Using 10, 720 complete performances with totals below 7000 points, this analysis tests whether the …
1 2 3 4 
61-69 / 69