Decathlon 2000 › Search results: Steve Fritz

Search results: Steve Fritz


1 2 
1-20 / 30
Relevancy:100%
Steve Fritz
Steve Fritz missed an Olympic medal by 20 points in Atlanta (1996). He had finished the best competition of his life, scoring 8644 points. That got him 4th place.
Relevancy:100%
Steve Fritz’s biography
Relevancy:38%
World Championships Athens 1997
Relevancy:38%
Olympic Games Atlanta 1996
Relevancy:38%
USA Championships Indianapolis 1997
Relevancy:38%
Talence 1993
Relevancy:38%
Talence 1994
Relevancy:38%
Talence 1996
Relevancy:38%
USA heptathlon all-time list
Relevancy:38%
USA decathlon all-time list
Relevancy:8%
World Championships Stuttgart 1993
Relevancy:8%
Goodwill Games Sankt-Peterburg 1994
Relevancy:8%
Talence Decastar records and winners of all-time
Relevancy:8%
USA Championships Atlanta 1996
Relevancy:8%
Talence 1991
Relevancy:8%
USA Championships Eugene 1999
Relevancy:8%
Talence 1992
Relevancy:8%
World heptathlon all-time list
Relevancy:8%
World Championships Paris 1997
Relevancy:8%
Decathlon World all-time list
1 2 
1-20 / 30
Support Decathlon 2000

Read more »
Smart links
  • RSS feeds
  • Decathlon points calculator
  • Decathlon rankings 1956 - 2019
  • Heptathlon rankings 1999 - 2020
  • Articles by year
  • Articles by countries
    • Latest comments
    Daniel Urien wrote on Dec 08, 2019 14:14
    Add Cameron BURROWS (USA) 2. 19 05/12/2019 Pittsburg-USA - 5381 points
    Read more »
    Janek Salmistu wrote on Dec 02, 2019
    I have decided to go ahead with Decathlon 2000 because I have had so much good wishes, inspiring words and...
    Read more »
    Thomas wrote on Sep 25, 2019
    Bit late to comment on this article but as much as I like Sebrle's carreer, I can't have him above...
    Read more »
    So they said
    Don’t have nine good events and end up losing out on a PR or a medal because of a slow 1500! - Robert Fournier
    Read more »
    Welcome to new users
    Kevin Dehodent Benjamin Parish said88 qingkoud43 werner ziebart Gotroch ahmed mousa Dean Grant Chang L.Baret
    Users by age
    10-20
     3%
    20-30
     17%
    30-40
     22%
    40-50
     17%
    50-60
     22%
    60-70
     11%
    70-80
     6%
    80-90
     1%
    Over 1000 total users »