Decathlon 2000 › Statistics › National all-time lists › USA decathlon all-time list
 2 votes

USA decathlon all-time list (4)

July 31, 2021
P Decathlete Points Results
1. Ashton Eaton
Beijing 29.08.2015		 9045 10,23 - 7.88 - 14.52 - 2.01 - 45,00 -
13,69 - 43.34 - 5.20 - 63.63 - 4.17,52
2. Dan O'Brien
Talence 05.09.92		 8891 10,43 - 8.08 - 16.69 - 2.07 - 48,51 -
13,98 - 48.56 - 5.00 - 62.58 - 4.42,10
3. Bryan Clay
Eugene 30.06.2008		 8832 10,39 - 7.39 - 15.17 - 2.08 - 48,41 -
13,75 - 52.74 - 5.00 - 70.55 - 4.50,97
4. Trey Hardee
Berlin 20.08.2009		 8790 10,45 - 7.83 - 15.33 - 1.99 - 48,13 -
13,86 - 48.08 - 5.20 - 68.00 - 4.48,91
5. Tom Pappas
Palo Alto 22.06.2003		 8784 10,78 - 7.96 - 16.28 - 2.17 - 48,22 -
14,13 - 45.84 - 5.20 - 60.77 - 4.48,12
6. Dave Johnson
Azusa 24.04.92		 8727 10,96 - 7.52 - 14.61 - 2.04 - 48,19 -
14,17 - 49.88 - 5.28 - 66.96 - 4.29,38
7. Chris Huffins
New Orleans 20.06.98		 8694 10,31 - 7.76 - 15.43 - 2.18 - 49,02 -
14,02 - 53.22 - 4.60 - 61.59 - 4.59,43
8. Garrett Scantling
Eugene, OR 21.06.2021		 8647 10,53 - 7.61 - 15.91 - 2.05 - 48,86 - 
13,88 - 48.17 - 5.15 - 64.21 - 4.57,75
9. Steve Fritz
Atlanta 01.08.96		 8644 10,90 - 7.77 - 15.31 - 2.04 - 50,13 -
13,97 - 49.84 - 5.10 - 65.70 - 4.38,26
10. Bruce Jenner
Montreal 30.07.76		 8634 10,94 - 7.22 - 15.35 - 2.03 - 47,51 -
14,80 - 50.04 - 4.80 - 68.52 - 4.12,61
11. Steven Bastien
Eugene, OR 21.06.2021		 8485 10,52 - 7.20 - 14.47 - 2.08 - 47,79 - 
14,24 - 42.10 - 4.95 - 61.20 - 4.22,21
12 Zach Ziemek
Eugene, OR 21.06.2021		 8471 10,70 - 7.74 - 14.79 - 2.14 - 50,89 - 
15,04 - 45.83 - 5.55 - 55.72 - 4.40,69
13. Jeremy Taiwo
Eugene 03.07.2016		 8425 10,94 - 7.55 - 14.88 - 2.21 - 48,76 -
14,22 - 42.10 - 4.75 - 52.82 - 4.17,35
14. Fred Dixon
Bloomington 14.08.77		 8397 10,85 - 7.44 - 15.20 - 2.04 - 48,54 -
14,94 - 47.14 - 4.60 - 67.88 - 4.30,21
15. Kip Janvrin
Atlanta 22.06.96		 8345 10,83 - 7.08 - 14.82 - 1.96 - 48,35 -
14,64 - 45.58 - 5.20 - 59.20 - 4.21,18
16. Devon Williams
Athens, GA 09.04.2017		 8345 10,72 - 7.75 - 14.20 - 1.96 - 48,14 -
13,83 - 46.29 - 4.57 - 60.26 - 4.36,79
17. Timothy Bright
San Jose 24.06.87		 8340 10,90 - 7.31 - 14.35 - 2.11 - 49,24
14,16 - 41.12 - 5.50 - 57.68 - 4.44,49
18. Michael Ramos
Los Angeles 21.05.86		 8322 10,77 - 7.39 - 14.67 - 2.16 - 50,16 -
14,98 - 49.06 - 4.80 - 63.52 - 4.48,06
19. Paul Terek
Sacramento 17.07.2004		 8312 10,98 - 7.27 - 15.37 - 2.01 - 48,74 -
15,40 - 49.24 - 5.20 - 54.69 - 4.24,28
20. Gunnar Nixon
Moskva 11.08.2013
 8312 10,84 - 7.80 - 14.68 - 2.14 - 48,56 -
14,57 - 42.38 - 4.60 - 57.97 - 4.35,82
21. William Toomey
Los Angeles 11.12.69		 8310 10,3 - 7.76 - 14.38 - 1.93 - 47,1 -
14,3 - 46.49 - 4.27 - 65.74 - 4.39,4
22. Harrison Williams
Eugene, OR 20.06.2021		 8306 10,79 - 7.55 - 14.24 - 1.99 - 48,21 - 
14,37 - 43.90 - 5.25 - 52.69 - 4.32,49
23. Sheldon Blockburger
Brescia 16.05.93		 8296 10,80 - 7.48 - 14.98 - 2.12 - 49,12 -
14,34 - 42.74 - 4.70 - 60.90 - 4.40,08
24. Gary Kinder
Indianapolis 21.07.88		 8293 10,82 - 7.20 - 16.34 - 2.02 - 49,74 -
14,95 - 47.72 - 5.00 - 66.32 - 4.55,39
25. Phil McMullen
Sacramento 17.07.2004		 8285 11,19 - 6.90 - 15.24 - 2.04 - 48,88 -
14,85 - 49.44 - 5.00 - 56.35 - 4.15,18
26. Brian Brophy
Austin 06.06.92		 8276 11,16 - 7.15 - 15.65 - 2.10 - 48,84 -
14,75 - 49.96 - 4.90 - 59.68 - 4.45,92
27. Shawn Wilbourn
Indianapolis 12.06.97		 8268 10,65 - 7.11 - 14.99 - 1.95 - 49,23 -
14,13 - 49.26 - 4.90 - 61.00 - 4.45,64
28. Mark Anderson
Walnut 22.04.83		 8267 11,11 - 7.03 - 14.86 - 2.10 - 49,21 -
15,77 - 42.50 - 4.70 - 76.42 - 4.21,75
29. Robert Jacob Arnold
Götzis 30.05.2010		 8253 11,04 - 6.96 - 15.17 - 2.00 - 49,29 -
14,12 - 46.51 - 5.10 - 62.28 - 4.40,74
30. Robert Coffman
Quebec City 12.08.79		 8248 10,71 - 7.37 - 15.92 - 1.90 - 48,85 -
13,91 - 49.52 - 4.50 - 56.36 - 4.36,5
31. Aric Long
New Orleans 27.06.92		 8237 11,32 - 7.33 - 15.45 - 2.12 - 49,95 -
14,83 - 48.18 - 5.10 - 58.78 - 4.46,42
32. Robert Muzzio
Stuttgart 20.08.93		 8237 11,11 - 6.72 - 16.99 - 1.94 - 49,82 -
14,51 - 47.90 - 5.00 - 64.50 - 4.34,43
33. Paul Foxson
Sacramento 16.04.94		 8234 11,00 - 7.52 - 14.56 - 2.06 - 48,58 -
15,12 - 47.22 - 4.80 - 58.30 - 4.33,60
34. Andrew Fucci
Atlanta 22.06.96		 8227 10,75 - 7.53 - 13.73 - 2.08 - 48,91 -
14,13 - 43.62 - 4.90 - 60.46 - 4.54,69
35. Solomon Simmons
Des Moines 26.07.2019
 8227 10,60 - 7.50 - 15.11 - 1.94 - 49,27 -
14,02 - 44.88 - 4.90 - 51.42 - 4.33,85
36. Garret Armstrong
Tallahassee 27.04.86		 8203 10,85 - 7.40 - 13.96 - 2.00 - 47,68 -
14,61 - 44.70 - 4.80 - 54.46 - 4.24,16

 

Wind assisted - average of the 3 events < 2.0 m/s
P Decathlete Points Results Wind
1. Kip Janvrin
Ewardsville 18.07.96		 8462
 10,61 - 7.34 - 14.64 - 1.96 - 48,20 -
14,48 - 45.84 - 5.00 - 61.82 - 4.20,12		 +4.1/+3.1/+5.7
2. Harrison Williams
Chula Vista, CA 16.04.2021
 8439
 10,64 - 7.70 - 14.34 - 1.93 - 47,46 - 
14,45 - 48.86 - 5.12 - 54.69 - 4.34,00
 +1.8/+1.3/+3.5
3. Ricky Barker
College Station 15.03.96
 8404
 10,72 - 7.53 - 14.53 - 2.10 - 48,60 -
14,23 - 43.78 - 5.20 - 58.88 - 4.49,56
 +3.2/+4.0/+3.0
4. John Sayre
Indianapolis 18.08.85		 8381
 10,86 - 7.41 - 14.22 - 2.00 - 49,98 -
14,84 - 46.08 - 5.30 - 67.68 - 4.37,07		 +5.6/+3.2/+6.8
5. Sheldon Blockburger
Norwalk 13.06.90		 8301
 10,84 - 7.85 - 13.88 - 2.10 - 49,81 -
14,61 - 43.24 - 4.90 - 61.84 - 4.41,91		 +1.1/+4.7/+3.6
6. Jay Thorson
Norwalk 13.06.90		 8246
 11,04 - 7.39 - 14.18 - 2.01 - 49,78 -
14,22 - 47.36 - 5.10 - 55.52 - 4.31,43		 +1.1/+3.2/+6.7
7. Michael Gonzalez
Saskatoon 14.08.88
 8203
 11,07 - 7.30 - 13.69 - 2.05 - 49,91 -
14,68 - 42.30 - 5.20 - 62.62 - 4.29,91
 +3.4/+4.0/+1.4

Comments (4)

Daniel Urien wrote on Dec 13, 2010
8.727 Johnson now legal mark with wind's new rule.
Notify us, if you think this comment is inappropriate
IP: 89.227.1...
Daniel Urien wrote on Dec 14, 2010
8.404 Barker now illegal wind (+3,2 +4,0 +3,0). 8.198 legal 16/09/1995 Talence

8.203 Gonzales now illegal wind (+3,4 +4,0 +1,4).
Notify us, if you think this comment is inappropriate
IP: 89.225.4...
JOAQUÍN CARMONA TORRE wrote on Dec 16, 2010
GREETINGS:
DANIEL, IS DUE TO WATCH THE WIND OF THE OTHER 2 LONG JUMP.
Notify us, if you think this comment is inappropriate
IP: 195.55....
gary bastien wrote on May 17, 2011
Number 29, Garrett Armstrong was busted for steroids on this performance. You really should not post it as a legitimate score. I knew something was up when he dropped from 11.3 100 and 50.5 100 meters and from 7,100 or less a majority of career to 8,300. Lordy.
Notify us, if you think this comment is inappropriate
IP: 98.224.2...

Please log in to add your comment!

Related images

Trey Hardee at Götzis Hypomeeting 2011Trey Hardee at Götzis Hypomeeting 2011
Trey Hardee at Götzis Hypomeeting 2009Trey Hardee at Götzis Hypomeeting 2009
Trey Hardee - Götzis Hypomeeting 2011Trey Hardee - Götzis Hypomeeting 2011
Trey Hardee at Götzis Hypomeeting 2009Trey Hardee at Götzis Hypomeeting 2009

Related videos

Ashton Eaton Decathlon World Record 9039pts Ashton Eaton Decathlon World Record 9039pts
Jan 12, 2015
Heptathlon World Record - Ashton Eaton 6499 pointsHeptathlon World Record - Ashton Eaton 6499 points
Sep 27, 2010
Support Decathlon 2000

Read more »
Smart links
  • RSS feeds
  • Decathlon points calculator
  • World Decathlon rankings
  • World Heptathlon rankings
  • Articles by year
  • Articles by countries
    • Latest comments
    Janek Salmistu wrote on Sep 11, 2021
    Worse news came for the Russian (in 2016), when he failed a doping re-test of the sample he gave in...
    Read more »
    GerardF wrote on Aug 10, 2021
    I hadn't thought of manual timing. Thanks.
    Read more »
    Daniel Urien wrote on Aug 09, 2021
    Ganyev : 14. 34 110H (4089 second day) Grebenyuk 8400 points (table '84)/8478 (table 64'). Hand timing. I don't understand...
    Read more »
    So they said
    I wish that in the nearest future everybody will know about decathlon and the meaning of the event of decathlon... decathletes are like our greek gods - Petros Kyprianou
    Read more »
    Welcome to new users
    Lothar Wegner Klaus Dieter Hucke Pedro Antonio Maurizio Boer ENRIQUE TRE Fernando Martins Tamás Bényei Bernd Hausmann Borislav Borisov Daniel Leandro
    Users by age
    10-20
     1%
    20-30
     16%
    30-40
     20%
    40-50
     19%
    50-60
     22%
    60-70
     13%
    70-80
     8%
    80-90
     1%
    Over 1000 total users »