Search from forum

als Übersicht über die bestimmenden Zehnkämpfer seit 1896 kann ich die fachliche Einordnung und Einschätzung der folgenden Ausarbeitung empfehlen: www. unvergessene leichtathletikstars. de Die Ausarbeitunh umfasst alle Disziplinen der Leichtathletik, wobei als Leseprobe der Zehnkampf angeboten wird. Der Vorteil ist dabei auch die Möglichkeit des sofortigen Aufrufes von Videos zum …

Kevin Mayer has set a new record in the decathlon with 9126 points. However, is he really better there hums of the single achievements than the present record holder Asthon Eaton ? Besides , the assesment differences of the achievements Mayer/Eaton to IAAF are compared to a comparison chart ( my new NBL ‐tablet) Where the point differences change substantially, one must see what …

I have put up a formula to the inquiry of an long jump. The jump width is dependent primarily on the approch speed and the jump strength. How big the reserve corner and the jump corner from physical and biomechanical view must be to achive the maximum width, it is calculated individually. Increases or the width about 15 cm are possible. Article in addition under : www. [...] …

In germany there are attemps in 1500m/800m run the Gundersen ‐method to introduce. It should have won for everybody obvisinsly him the multiple event, which is as first in the aim. The point distances after the javeling throw should be converted for it into time intervals. In addition I would like to ascertain : 1. the point table of the IAAF is a progressive table. …

The high jump height is determined by many performance signs. The logical mutual influencing of these performance signs is known. Nevertheless , the effect of the change of single parameters on the whole height in cm has not been discribed yet. I have created a possibility of the calculation with a model. Thus is to be seen, how much itself for example , the change of the jump corner …

Multiventers are all around trained. Therefore their skills include various technical processes. Now there is a suggestion for a new high ‐jump technique called rotary ‐jump. Do all ‐around athletes have trouble dealing with the new technique? Here you can find detailed introduction of the new technique : www. [...] ‐site. de and than Anliegen and I. /H. …

We are in agreement determines us, that combined eventers have earned more attention. Therefore my proposal for the introduction of a short combined event ( 3 disciplines ). Of it the athlet can select the sprint discipline freely. The expenditure is not big. The advantage ‐ with this short combined event the athletes of the much more often public can appear. The image of the …

I am a German Decathlon fan. For a long time the points system of the decathlon interests me. I have discovered some mistakes in the IAAF table point of Dr. Trkal. 12, 88 s more than 110 m hurdles are not better than 8, 25 m in the long jump ? Both performances receive to IAAF immediately many points. Or: 12, 88 s more than 110 m hurdles are not better than 62, 01 m in the discus throw ? …

ich kann da ein ähnliches Beispiel bringen. Bei der WM 2007 in Osaka gewann R. Sebrle vor dem Canadier Smith. Dabei war Smith in 5 Disziplinen besser als Sebrle , 3 mal waren die Leistungen sehr ähnlich und nur 2 mal war Sebrle besser ( Hochsprung und Speerwerfen ) Nun gab es die Platzwertung nur im 19. Jahrhundert, sie wäre mit 11 zu 15 für Smith ausgegangen. Aber sie ist ein …

as an overview of the determining decathletes since 1896 I can recommend the professional classifikation and assessment of the following elaboration: www. unvergessene leichtathletikstars. de The elaboration covers all disciplines of athletics, with the decathlon offered a reading. The advantage is also the possibility of immediate call of videos on the athlete in qustion. I have never …

hello Thomas , the confrontation single achievments to combined event resultat is interesting. I think, would have Mayer still better single achievments if he denied the disciplines more often in the competition. Then the difference sum of the single achievments points to combined event points would be bigger. However, for combined events is importent how well the disciplines are …

hello Thomas , Athletes and trainers are also directed after how much point increase brings her achievements potential. This is o. k. A better achievement must brings more points, but how many ? This must be fair about all disciplines. However the current table IAAF does not create this. For the decathlon. Are 45, 00 seconds not more than 400 m any more worth than 19, 36 m shut …

Your proposal sounds rather difficult. Moreover, remains the problem that one cannot convert a point distance after javeling throwing into a time intervall more than 1500 m. 4.20,00 - 4.30,00 = 67 points 4:50,00 - 5:00,00 = 59 points

before the table of the IAAF 1985 there was the belgrader table of 1964. This changed above all the too strong progression of the 1950 ‐th table in the technical disciplines. Then the table of 1985 introduced a progression in the point calculation for all disciplines. Indeed, the table 1985 is also faulty. I recommend you to the history of multi ‐event tables the following …

the enlarged version 2014 considers above all that all movements take place in the high jump in the 3 - dimensional space. see : www.leichtathletikimwandelmitnbl-site.de in IV./B

an enlarged representation rotary-jump - technology into english is to be found in . www.leichtathletikimwandelmitnbl-site.de/III-english-version of.../C

... Rotary-jump are 10 m radius. The calculations are to be read up on my webpage www.nbl-methode sonnemann in I,/H. The jump corner arise from the information of Dr.W.Killing ( see spring proof ...

dear Wermouth, According to my calculations the rotary ‐jump ‐jumper needs not 8, 1 m/s start fast ( Flop), but only 7, 1 m/s. Than he can jump a new WR. Because : 1. ) additional centrifugal force 2. ) no impulse loss, because direction jump = direction run ‐up speed. 3. ) better bar passage ( 0 cm ) It is fine in such a way, …

Because of the advantages in te technology and leap over the bar one can jump with the rotary-jump higher than with the Flop. And at lower approach speed. The technology looks bad to all jumping kinds with beginners. Follow please:With the rotary-jump the centrifugal force the impulse curve arrives to the approach speed.

Should it not be worth an attempt to put down the negative points of the Flop and to use the positives ones ? So : 1.) run-up impulse and jump direction agree 2.) Advantages of the run-up with impulse curve

Unfortunately , an English version of the text is not given yet.The video of R.Avant goes with me with strg. + enter . Try it, nevertheless,once again. Greeting Gunther

Hello Wermouth, may I answer to you a little bit in addition ? To find achivment equivalences from multi ‐eventers and specialists is not the gravity. It is more difficulty to illustrate this knowledge with a mathematical formula. The formula of IAAF are only fairly good in the area 8000 points. The evaluation Dr. Spiriev for rankings is only for top performances. Only because …

hello enn, Every appraisal remains subjective, of course anyhow. However, these are 12, 88 about hurdles better than 62, 01 m in discus throw, or 1, 52 m shot put worse than 81, 22 s more than 400 m , everybody knows. This should be put down, because, otherwise also the middle performance areas are not right. Now thus every 3 rd championship on the first 3 places is actually wrong ! …

Hello enn, Nevertheless, it is important that only performances get the same score which are equally good in quality. Average efficienties of decathlonis not always are it also. Also specialist performances are not always equally good. Therefore, I take from all performance areas of decathlonis and specialists statistical values. ( II. /D. 7. 1 ) My point formulae illustrate all clues …

once again : By my score what is worth a performance I abolish the separation decathlon / specialists. Statistical performance equivalences from both areas are used to develop the point formulae discipline. See leading points in II/D.7.1 and formulae evolution in II/D.7.3

Hello enn, Thanks for your answer. It is difficult to explain the subject here completely. Fact is: there are so many scoring tables internationally and nationwide, this is already a proof enough which is ( up to now ) no table without coarse mistakes. Whichn is why I abolish the differentiation [...] I have explained on my website under II. /E7 . Maybe you can read it into German? …

Hello enn, Thanks for your answer. It is difficult to explain the subject here completely. Fact is: there are so many scoring tables internationally and nationwide, this is already a proof enough which is ( up to now ) no table without coarse mistakes. Whichn is why I abolish the differentiation [...] I have explained on my website under II. /E7 . Maybe you can read it into German? …

... myself. To read in : www.leichtathletikimwandelmitnbl-site.de or simply : www.nbl-methode sonnemann Especially the english version in III. With me are : 20 m SP = 10,18 s ( 9,98 s ) 100 m ...