Decathlon 2000 › Heptathlon › Championships › World Championships Birmingham 2003
 1 votes

World Championships Birmingham 2003 (0)

Jan 25, 2010
P Athlete Nation Points Results
1 Tom Pappas USA 6361 6,89 - 7.56 - 16.23 - 2.17 - 7,80 - 4.90 - 2.51,65
2 Lev Lobodin RUS 6297 6,95 - 7.22 - 16.51 - 2.05 - 7,89 - 5.30 - 2.48,25
3 Roman Šebrle CZE 6196 7,07 - 7.62 - 15.20 - 2.08 - 8,02 - 5.00 - 2.46,20
4 Jon Arnar Magnusson ISL 6185 7,14 - 7.63 - 16.20 - 2.02 - 8,06 - 5.10 - 2.47,60
5 Tomaš Dvorak CZE 6005 7,17 - 7.21 - 16.00 - 2.02 - 8,04 - 4.70 - 2.41,79
6 Aleksandr Pogorelov RUS 5999 7,11 - 7.37 - 14.87 - 2.11 - 8,03 - 4.80 - 2.52,36
7 Laurent Hernu FRA 5988 7,15 - 7.34 - 14.07 - 2.02 - 8,03 - 4.90 - 2.41,83
dnf Erki Nool EST DNF 7,08 - 7.38 - 0 - DNS

Please log in to add your comment!

Related images

Laurent HernuLaurent Hernu
Laurent HernuLaurent Hernu
Laurent HernuLaurent Hernu
Laurent HernuLaurent Hernu
Support Decathlon 2000

Read more »
Smart links
  • RSS feeds
  • Decathlon points calculator
  • World Decathlon rankings
  • World Heptathlon rankings
  • Articles by year
  • Articles by countries
    • Latest comments
    Janek Salmistu wrote on Sep 11, 2021
    Worse news came for the Russian (in 2016), when he failed a doping re-test of the sample he gave in...
    Read more »
    GerardF wrote on Aug 10, 2021
    I hadn't thought of manual timing. Thanks.
    Read more »
    Daniel Urien wrote on Aug 09, 2021
    Ganyev : 14. 34 110H (4089 second day) Grebenyuk 8400 points (table '84)/8478 (table 64'). Hand timing. I don't understand...
    Read more »
    So they said
    Decathlon 2000 always used to be a huge inspiration and now I’m glad to be a part of the team here! It gives me an opportunity to discuss and write about the decathlon and to meet people with the same interests - Jessica Bullenkamp
    Read more »
    Welcome to new users
    Klaus Dieter Hucke Pedro Antonio Maurizio Boer ENRIQUE TRE Fernando Martins Tamás Bényei Bernd Hausmann Borislav Borisov Daniel Leandro Héctor Gasulla Borrás
    Users by age
    10-20
     1%
    20-30
     17%
    30-40
     20%
    40-50
     19%
    50-60
     22%
    60-70
     13%
    70-80
     8%
    80-90
     1%
    Over 1000 total users »